Why the banksters don't lend to business.

All business new and old is becoming less profitable.

Pronouncements on the importance of growth is a form of madness - denial.

Banksters can get a guaranteed income just by holding the money given to them by governments and placing it in government vehicles for cash.

Lending money back to government also removes banksters debt exposure risk by securing future monetisation of the debt.
The less lent the more credit government will supply to try and achieve velocity.
Further co-joining the futures of governments and banks.

Reaching velocity is a probability game as the effects of asset deflation / resource inflation become greater in the economy, efforts to increase moneys availability become more overt until der plebs get the message of inevitable monetisation and start acquiring tangible assets.

Deflation of static assets like a house as the earning potential of its occupants is progressively reduced on the world market and inflation in the prices of resources that are bought in the same with devalued currency.

The West must decline in terms of real economic output, costs are > cf. the East so oil will flow in that direction as they can turn a bigger profit from the same energy.
Globalisation provided the means for the world elites to disenfranchise the West's population by freely transferring capital and technology.

The idea that knowledge based industries create wealth and is the future of the West is bunkum for the masses, access to ever increasing energy flows fueled the industrial revolution, the rest is self serving propaganda.

Disenfranchised populations have and are still war fighting to maintain the elites control of energy and resources, now with an ever smaller piece of the pie in return - you may have noticed food packet sizes are shrinking, mentioned on BBC radios long running drama 'The Archers'.

What we need is a currency that decreases in size as the GDP shrinks, along with a shrinking population.

The tide is going out.

This ice volume chart is enough to raise the hairs on the back of my neck.

Interested in Le Temps?
As usual the mass media are not reporting anything approaching real 'news'.

To get a handle on what is really happening you must watch this Arctic amplification lecture from Jennifer Francis, Rutgers University.
A good exposition she is a bit shaky on a few points but the central theme is right on in my opinion i.e. the Jet Stream (Rosby waves / bands) is weakening due to missing Arctic ice cover esp. since 2007:
the Jet Stream used to keep Arctic cold bottled up by forming fast circular weather systems over winter;
warm weather moving North and warmer in the South;
less temperature difference between Arctic and lower latitudes as the overall temperatures rise especially quickly in the Arctic;
slow moving weather systems care of the weakened Jet Stream allow extreme weather of all sorts to form.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtRvcXUIyZg

There are other processes at work positive feedbacks are hypothesised to be kicking in about now, a key one is reduced mixing of cold and warm ocean currents.
So the surface gets heated more but transfers a smaller proportion of the heat to the deep water where it would be unable to impact surface temperatures for a time period.
This could be a contributing factor (the Gulf Stream) to the 5-10 years doubling time for Greenland melt water volumes.
Combined with Greenland and the Eastern US coast being in an area that typically forms an inflection point for the Jet Stream as it swings North marking a top of the evolving boundaries.

More on the same lines all worth watching the main interview starts at

23m featuring an interview with a scientist that quotes the doubling time of 5 -10 years who has been to Greenland recently and returns shortly.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=vWARYfLnDXI